Last night I finished the book “The Flinch” by Julien Smith. The message came at an interesting time, since I have recently been entertaining the idea of searching for a new job (mine has become somewhat stale), moving cities, and generally starting anew. In addition to reinforcing the principles of hormesis and reason promoted by the Paleo scenesters, the book offers a very interesting take on the myriad reasons why people fail to achieve the level of happiness they dream of, whether in work or personally.

He called it “the flinch”. The force in our mind, shaped by experience and social conditioning, which leads us to fear the unknown. It’s the resistance. The voice in the back of our head that interprets the risks of failure, embarrassment, or pain, and allows us to talk ourselves out of the pursuit. It is the reason that we fail to experience childlike curiosity for the entirety of our lives.

It’s the reason most people are afraid of the prospect of leaving a secure, “good” job, moving cities, changing lifestyles, and seeking fulfillment doing something new. And it’s exactly why I am forcing myself to explore that change. To try to find something better. To beat the flinch.

Today’s post on Robbwolf.com brought the second part of a five-part series of interviews with renowned farmer, activist, and sustainable food extraodinaire Joel Salatin.  During the interview (which I highly recommend watching), Joel comments that farmers markets could be more widely accepted by the masses if there were a central checkout location where you could pay with a credit card, versus dealing in cash with each individual farmer.

Would a central checkout system work for farmers markets, and what are other changes that could change the popular food-purchasing paradigm on a personal level (or make a 7 out of a 5, as Joel might put it)?

At first glance, the physical construction of most farmers markets would prevent such a setup, and here’s why:  They are meant to take place one or two mornings per week, and for a short window of time (usually four hours).  Since these are usually low traffic times for businesses, the farmers markets are welcomed with open arms, and usually given space in parking lots or open lawn areas.  Plenty of room for the farmers to set up their displays, along with extra space for a band, coffee vendor, dog adoption zone, t-shirt sales, cooking demos, you name it.

The open space and multiple entrance/exit points that permit the market to become a destination where an entire morning can be spent socializing and loitering works against the concept of the market using supermarket-style transactions from a security (thievery) and payment (how to divvy up the cash/credit, taxes, etc) perspective.

These problems could be solved by creating a single store or location, in which the owners of the store purchase goods from the farmers, then sell them with a markup (i.e. supermarkets).  From here it just becomes a matter of scale between the mom-and-pop neighborhood market and a more local-oriented conglomerate like Whole Foods or Trader Joe’s.

Each has their benefits, and I suppose personal preference and where you sit on Joel’s food independence scale determines your level of interest and participation.  For my money, going and speaking to the people who grew/raised the food I’m going to consume is rewarding in and of itself.  There’s something about physically putting your cash into their hands in exchange for quality edible material that makes it far more meaningful than automatic belts, constant beeping sounds of varying decibels, and a tattooed college kid asking if you found everything OK.  Not to mention being outside and walking about for the morning, chance encounters with folks you haven’t seen in a long time, or the possibility of finding some REALLY good local band that you just have to check out again.

I can also appreciate that there are both farmers and consumers out there for whom that scene is not attractive.  A lot of people enjoy their routine, and would rather do their business in privacy (heads out of the gutter folks).  For them, a store that purchases the food from the farmers, then sells it to the masses from a permanent location is perfect.  I drove 25 minutes (each way) to one such store today, just to see what the prices and availability were like.  Sure, there was some food from Mexico, and some from a little farther away than I would have liked, but over all, good quality, very fresh, and VERY cheap.  It was also a husband-wife operation where their 6 year-old daughter sat behind a table sorting a bushel of green beans while making up songs about produce.  ”Oh, brawww-ko-leeeee…”.  It’s a place worth spending your money.

Our $22 trip to the produce market!

As is the more expensive, bourgeois outdoor market at the trendy, “green”, mixed-use historical renovation district that’s a mere 4 miles from my house.  Which I shouldn’t dog, considering the firm I work for is the landscape architect for the project and actually designed the farmers market area, but it can be a bit stuffy all the time.  Plenty of good produce though, and it offers the personal interaction with farmers that I enjoy, as well as the coffee, bands, and occasional noontime margaritas.

Land the plane, Tim.  What the heck is the point?

The point is that it is going to take varying degrees of eater/farmer interface and a huge variety in retail options if we are to move everyone closer to food independence.  It is also going to take a higher density of market options, which the supermarket chains will definitely have something to say about.  Until every human is within efficient striking distance of a purveyor of quality edibles (in whatever form), the big box retailer on the frontage road and their  low-quality wares will continue to win.  Just as with fuel independence, economic independence, and everything else.  So get out there and vote with your wallet!

As defined by the omniscient Wikipedia, “sustainable urbanism” is:

New Urbanism.

Yep, there is no definition for “sustainable urbanism”.  Perhaps this is because it isn’t a product yet.  No one can buy, sell, or trade sustainable urbanism.  Still, the question remains.  What is sustainable urbanism?

Aside from being two incredibly popular buzzwords smashed together, the initial response would be that sustainable urbanism is a method of developing dense (i.e. urban) human-centered environments that are built and maintained in a way that does not sacrifice the ability for future environments to maintain themselves.

Without going into the differences between the ideas of “sustainable” versus “thrivable”, one could also assume that sustainable urbanism should deliver an environment that:

-Maximizes human health and happiness.

-Protects and nourishes the natural ecosystems that provide humans the ability to create such habitat.

That’s it.  Two things.  Differences in construction materials, lot platting schemes, food availability, water usage, and the like mean very little if they cannot withstand the rigor of those two criteria.  Each method/process/material must also not be judged by initial impressions, but by in-depth analysis.

Stone and wood may be very pleasing, warm, construction materials, but how are they extracted from the land?  If the method by which they were produced does not protect and nourish the earth, then they can not be considered part of a sustainable urbanism.

By the same standard, if a method of “urbanism” seeks to implement traditional (i.e. pre-1900) city development patterns as an addendum to post-WWII suburban sprawl by dictating lot layouts, street block ratios, and building heights, but contributes little to the health of its inhabitants, it can not be considered a sustainable urbanism.

So for design professionals in regional/city/planning roles, or for regular folks who are concerned about their health and the health of their environment:  The next time you are faced with a decision to purchase a certain good, purchase a home, dictate form for a road, house, plaza, or otherwise, judge it against the aforementioned criteria.

You may find that sustainable urbanism is not something to be dictated or imposed.  It is something created by everyday decisions that contribute to the well-being of the whole.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.